claims review Get the file

Seven checks for any MMY page

Seven checks, in the order they cost effort. Run them against any page that talks about MMY, including this one. A page that fails the early checks does not get the benefit of the later ones.

1. Byte count

The channel file measured on 10 November 2026 is 20,954,528 bytes, 19.98 MB. The second file is 21,049,457 bytes. Both figures are exact. A page that says "about 20 MB" has not looked. A page that says 32 MB, 39 MB or 42 MB is describing a file this review has not seen, and pages elsewhere do print those figures next to version 1.2.4.

The check takes one glance at the download once it finishes. A file that lands short of the number was cut off, and a cut-off APK fails later with a parse error that looks like a compatibility problem. Compare before you open.

2. Version code

versionName 2.2.5 is a label. versionCode 225 is the integer Android compares. A page can print any label it likes, and a file can carry a flattering label over an old code. Ask for the code. If the page does not know it, the page has not dumped the file, and its version sentence is a claim.

The practical consequence sits at install time. Android accepts an update only when the new code is higher than the installed one, the package name matches, and the signing key matches. A higher-looking name with an equal code is refused.

3. Package name

The channel file is com.mmyuionn.opp02. The second file is com.Mymuqiueb.ineb. Both use the label MMY. A page that says MMY without a package name is not identifying an app. The name confusion page is the long version of this check, including what happens if you install both.

4. Hash

SHA-256 of the channel file is b699d1480b19ec1fb28974c90df518bc7ff989e0900ec9fcc4beef7c353e6421. This is the check that ends the argument. Two files with the same hash are the same file, whatever their names and whatever the pages say. A page that publishes a hash is offering to be checked. A page that publishes a rating instead has chosen a figure you cannot check.

Compute it with the checksum tool on a computer, or with a file manager that shows one on the phone. Compare the full string. A match covers the bytes only. It says nothing about what the app does after launch, and this site does not dress a hash match up as a safety verdict.

5. Permission count

Both measured files declare thirteen permissions. The list has no contacts, no SMS, no camera, no location. It does have the advertising-id permission and an install-referrer lookup. A page that says the app asks for two permissions, or that it collects nothing, is simpler than the manifest. The data-safety text on the listing is a case of this, treated on the claims versus file page.

Count is the cheap version of the check. If a page cannot say thirteen, it has not read the manifest. If it can, read past the count to the advertising-id line before you decide the data-safety paragraph convinced you.

6. Who publishes the page

A claim is only as independent as the page making it. The install listing is published by the side that gains the install, so its rating, its reviews count and its downloads count are the seller describing the seller. The developer site is the studio describing the studio. This site is an independent review, and it says so in the footer of every page rather than in a badge.

The question to ask is not whether the page looks official. It is whether the page and the subject are the same party. When they are, quote the page as a claim. When they are not, you still owe the page nothing until it shows its measurements.

7. Does the number have a source

Ratings, download counts, rupee amounts, bonus figures, payout times. Each is a number that wants a source, a date, and a way to be checked. The posters fail this on sight, which is the artwork page. The listing's counts fail it because no third party is named. A number that arrives without those three is a decoration, and a review that repeats it has adopted someone else's decoration as its own fact.

Seven checks. The first four identify the file. The last three identify the page. A file can pass while the page selling it fails, and that is the ordinary case.

Run the seven against this site too. The byte count, version code, package name, hash and permission count are on this page and on the home page, dated 10 November 2026. The publisher is named in the footer. No number here lacks a source, because the numbers that lack one were left out.